<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 2056 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470486</link>
    <description>Pendency of a writ petition, later withdrawn to pursue the statutory appellate remedy, constituted sufficient cause for delay in filing the first appeal. Rejecting the appeal solely as time-barred without considering the explanation and condonation material was improper. The delay was condoned, and the first appellate authority was directed to admit and decide the appeal afresh after granting an opportunity of hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 19:00:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=914005" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 2056 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470486</link>
      <description>Pendency of a writ petition, later withdrawn to pursue the statutory appellate remedy, constituted sufficient cause for delay in filing the first appeal. Rejecting the appeal solely as time-barred without considering the explanation and condonation material was improper. The delay was condoned, and the first appellate authority was directed to admit and decide the appeal afresh after granting an opportunity of hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470486</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>