<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 1878 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470487</link>
    <description>Denial of a requested video conference hearing in faceless appellate proceedings breaches principles of natural justice where no valid reason is given. The applicable framework requires a requested personal hearing to be afforded, preferably through video conference. As the hearing request was not granted, the cash-credit addition was not examined on merits. The appellate order was set aside for fresh adjudication after granting the requested hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 19:00:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=914004" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 1878 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470487</link>
      <description>Denial of a requested video conference hearing in faceless appellate proceedings breaches principles of natural justice where no valid reason is given. The applicable framework requires a requested personal hearing to be afforded, preferably through video conference. As the hearing request was not granted, the cash-credit addition was not examined on merits. The appellate order was set aside for fresh adjudication after granting the requested hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470487</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>