<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 1267 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470453</link>
    <description>Contributions to Udyog Bandhu that are incidental to an assessee&#039;s business fall within the statutory allowance for business expenditure. Prior decisions concerning materially identical contributions govern the issue, supporting deduction of the contribution as revenue business expenditure. The contribution was therefore treated as allowable business expenditure in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 15:39:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=913979" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 1267 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470453</link>
      <description>Contributions to Udyog Bandhu that are incidental to an assessee&#039;s business fall within the statutory allowance for business expenditure. Prior decisions concerning materially identical contributions govern the issue, supporting deduction of the contribution as revenue business expenditure. The contribution was therefore treated as allowable business expenditure in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470453</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>