https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52920 The Tribunal ordered M/s. De-Nocil to make a pre-deposit of Rs. 50 Lakhs towards duty and furnish a Bank Guarantee for the balance duty within 8 weeks. Other appellants were directed to pre-deposit 25% of the penalties levied on them within the same timeframe. Failure to comply would result in the dismissal of the appeals. The Tribunal invalidated duty exemption under Notification No. 34/97-Cus due to forged documents and non-existent transferers, emphasizing strict adherence to exemption conditions. Appellants' financial hardship claims were rejected, and an investigation into officials' roles in the fraudulent grant of D.E.P.B.s was ordered to prevent duty loss and ensure accountability. en-us Fri, 02 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 Oct 2010 15:06:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52920 The Tribunal ordered M/s. De-Nocil to make a pre-deposit of Rs. 50 Lakhs towards duty and furnish a Bank Guarantee for the balance duty within 8 weeks. Other appellants were directed to pre-deposit 25% of the penalties levied on them within the same timeframe. Failure to comply would result in the dismissal of the appeals. The Tribunal invalidated duty exemption under Notification No. 34/97-Cus due to forged documents and non-existent transferers, emphasizing strict adherence to exemption conditions. Appellants' financial hardship claims were rejected, and an investigation into officials' roles in the fraudulent grant of D.E.P.B.s was ordered to prevent duty loss and ensure accountability. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 02 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52920