<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 1513 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470450</link>
    <description>Arbitrator neutrality under Section 12(5) read with the Seventh Schedule renders officers of a disputing respondent-State ineligible to continue on an arbitral tribunal where no substantive proceedings occurred after its constitution and the matter remained stayed. The provision applies notwithstanding a prior contractual appointment arrangement and treats persons within prohibited relationships as de jure unable to act. Ineligibility may be waived only by an express written agreement made after the dispute arises; participation in proceedings or party conduct is not a waiver. The officer-members&#039; mandate therefore terminated by operation of law, requiring appointment of a fresh independent arbitrator.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 13:10:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=913967" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 1513 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470450</link>
      <description>Arbitrator neutrality under Section 12(5) read with the Seventh Schedule renders officers of a disputing respondent-State ineligible to continue on an arbitral tribunal where no substantive proceedings occurred after its constitution and the matter remained stayed. The provision applies notwithstanding a prior contractual appointment arrangement and treats persons within prohibited relationships as de jure unable to act. Ineligibility may be waived only by an express written agreement made after the dispute arises; participation in proceedings or party conduct is not a waiver. The officer-members&#039; mandate therefore terminated by operation of law, requiring appointment of a fresh independent arbitrator.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470450</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>