<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Capacity-based pan masala cess failed equality review where deemed production treated materially different machine outputs alike.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102147</link>
    <description>Capacity-based cess on pan masala packing machines was examined against Article 14 because the levy charged identical cess within a capacity slab despite substantial differences in actual output. The article states that deeming production, rather than taxing actual production, lacked rational classification and created manifest inequality; the capacity-based levy, related Rules and consequential notifications were therefore invalidated to that extent. It also notes that restricting abatement to continuous machine non-operation of at least fifteen days was arbitrary because genuine shorter shutdowns received no relief. Parliament&#039;s residuary power to levy cess on ownership or possession of machines was upheld, subject to constitutional equality requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 09:43:06 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 09:43:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=913944" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Capacity-based pan masala cess failed equality review where deemed production treated materially different machine outputs alike.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102147</link>
      <description>Capacity-based cess on pan masala packing machines was examined against Article 14 because the levy charged identical cess within a capacity slab despite substantial differences in actual output. The article states that deeming production, rather than taxing actual production, lacked rational classification and created manifest inequality; the capacity-based levy, related Rules and consequential notifications were therefore invalidated to that extent. It also notes that restricting abatement to continuous machine non-operation of at least fifteen days was arbitrary because genuine shorter shutdowns received no relief. Parliament&#039;s residuary power to levy cess on ownership or possession of machines was upheld, subject to constitutional equality requirements.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 09:43:06 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102147</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>