<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Reasoned fraud-classification orders must address defences; proceedings against an uninvolved former director could not be restarted.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102122</link>
    <description>Fraud classification under the RBI Fraud Master Circular, 2024 requires a reasoned order addressing the relevant facts, the noticee&#039;s submissions and the reasons for rejecting them. An order that merely reproduces forensic-audit observations and the show-cause notice, without dealing with defences, reflects non-application of mind and cannot sustain classification. The discussion further notes that proceedings against a former non-executive director were unsustainable for the audit review period where the forensic report attributed no fraudulent transaction or allegation to that director and no personal guarantee was produced. The fraud-classification order was set aside, with no permission to recommence proceedings for that period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 09:22:08 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 09:22:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=913919" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Reasoned fraud-classification orders must address defences; proceedings against an uninvolved former director could not be restarted.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102122</link>
      <description>Fraud classification under the RBI Fraud Master Circular, 2024 requires a reasoned order addressing the relevant facts, the noticee&#039;s submissions and the reasons for rejecting them. An order that merely reproduces forensic-audit observations and the show-cause notice, without dealing with defences, reflects non-application of mind and cannot sustain classification. The discussion further notes that proceedings against a former non-executive director were unsustainable for the audit review period where the forensic report attributed no fraudulent transaction or allegation to that director and no personal guarantee was produced. The fraud-classification order was set aside, with no permission to recommence proceedings for that period.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 09:22:08 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102122</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>