<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1678 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795792</link>
    <description>Prior approval under the proviso to Section 33(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code is mandatory before a liquidator invokes arbitration for a corporate debtor, because an arbitration request commences proceedings on receipt and approval must precede invocation. However, non-compliance does not make the invocation void from inception, as Section 33(5) does not prescribe that consequence. Post facto approval makes the invocation effective from the approval date, preserving potential recoveries for the liquidation estate while requiring subsequent arbitral steps to run from that date. The notes state that a sole arbitrator was appointed to determine the contractual disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 08:30:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=913899" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1678 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795792</link>
      <description>Prior approval under the proviso to Section 33(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code is mandatory before a liquidator invokes arbitration for a corporate debtor, because an arbitration request commences proceedings on receipt and approval must precede invocation. However, non-compliance does not make the invocation void from inception, as Section 33(5) does not prescribe that consequence. Post facto approval makes the invocation effective from the approval date, preserving potential recoveries for the liquidation estate while requiring subsequent arbitral steps to run from that date. The notes state that a sole arbitrator was appointed to determine the contractual disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795792</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>