https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795797 A sanction order implementing an earlier judicial direction for payment of the value of perished seized goods is distinguished from an appealable adjudication order where it neither decides a dispute nor determines a pending interest claim. Acceptance of the sanctioned tariff value does not resolve a separately asserted claim for interest on delayed payment. The notes state that the interest representation requires a reasoned determination by the competent customs authority in accordance with law, rather than relegation to the statutory appellate mechanism. en-us Thu, 02 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Jul 2026 08:30:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795797 A sanction order implementing an earlier judicial direction for payment of the value of perished seized goods is distinguished from an appealable adjudication order where it neither decides a dispute nor determines a pending interest claim. Acceptance of the sanctioned tariff value does not resolve a separately asserted claim for interest on delayed payment. The notes state that the interest representation requires a reasoned determination by the competent customs authority in accordance with law, rather than relegation to the statutory appellate mechanism. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 02 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795797