<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1685 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795799</link>
    <description>Substantial questions arise on the availability and interpretation of customs and integrated tax exemptions for orthopaedic implants, including the meaning of goods for disabled persons and the consequences of an interpretative dispute over exemption notifications. The questions also concern the consequential demand, limitation, confiscation and penalty. The appeal was admitted on three substantial questions of law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 08:30:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=913892" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1685 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795799</link>
      <description>Substantial questions arise on the availability and interpretation of customs and integrated tax exemptions for orthopaedic implants, including the meaning of goods for disabled persons and the consequences of an interpretative dispute over exemption notifications. The questions also concern the consequential demand, limitation, confiscation and penalty. The appeal was admitted on three substantial questions of law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795799</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>