<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (1) TMI 228 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52911</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the condonation of delay application, Stay petition, and appeal filed by the Commissioner of Customs as they were deemed to lack jurisdiction. The appeal was authorized without verifying if the order appealed against was issued by the appropriate authority. The Tribunal criticized the Commissioner for a lack of application of mind and disregard for the law. The judgment directed the Registry to inform relevant authorities of the decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 13:51:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91388" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (1) TMI 228 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52911</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the condonation of delay application, Stay petition, and appeal filed by the Commissioner of Customs as they were deemed to lack jurisdiction. The appeal was authorized without verifying if the order appealed against was issued by the appropriate authority. The Tribunal criticized the Commissioner for a lack of application of mind and disregard for the law. The judgment directed the Registry to inform relevant authorities of the decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52911</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>