<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1702 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795816</link>
    <description>Cash gifts received on marriage and retained for household or medical contingencies may constitute a satisfactory explanation for demonetisation-period cash deposits where surrounding circumstances support the explanation. The notes state that retention of cash for the medical needs of a specially-abled step-son and an ailing mother-in-law could not be rejected on conjecture. In the absence of material linking the cash to an undisclosed source, unaccounted business activity, or other incriminating circumstances, incomplete documentation and the time between marriage and demonetisation were insufficient to classify the deposits as unexplained money. The addition under Section 69A and consequential taxation under Section 115BBE were deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 08:30:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=913875" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1702 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795816</link>
      <description>Cash gifts received on marriage and retained for household or medical contingencies may constitute a satisfactory explanation for demonetisation-period cash deposits where surrounding circumstances support the explanation. The notes state that retention of cash for the medical needs of a specially-abled step-son and an ailing mother-in-law could not be rejected on conjecture. In the absence of material linking the cash to an undisclosed source, unaccounted business activity, or other incriminating circumstances, incomplete documentation and the time between marriage and demonetisation were insufficient to classify the deposits as unexplained money. The addition under Section 69A and consequential taxation under Section 115BBE were deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795816</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>