<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1728 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795842</link>
    <description>Territorial jurisdiction for an appeal against an assessment order lies with the High Court having jurisdiction over the place where the assessment order was made. As both the assessment and appellate orders originated in Hyderabad, the subsequent relocation of the respondent&#039;s registered office to Bangalore did not create jurisdiction for the Karnataka High Court. The appeal was therefore not maintainable before that High Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 08:30:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=913849" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1728 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795842</link>
      <description>Territorial jurisdiction for an appeal against an assessment order lies with the High Court having jurisdiction over the place where the assessment order was made. As both the assessment and appellate orders originated in Hyderabad, the subsequent relocation of the respondent&#039;s registered office to Bangalore did not create jurisdiction for the Karnataka High Court. The appeal was therefore not maintainable before that High Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795842</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>