<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1749 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795863</link>
    <description>Unsigned assessment orders that have been quashed cannot be revived by later affixing a manual or digital signature, including through a successor officer. The authorities may commence and complete fresh proceedings in accordance with law, but cannot reissue the same predetermined quashed orders after a merely formal hearing. Protection from limitation for any such reissued orders is unsustainable. Fresh assessment action remains available only through lawful procedure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 10:43:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=913828" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1749 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795863</link>
      <description>Unsigned assessment orders that have been quashed cannot be revived by later affixing a manual or digital signature, including through a successor officer. The authorities may commence and complete fresh proceedings in accordance with law, but cannot reissue the same predetermined quashed orders after a merely formal hearing. Protection from limitation for any such reissued orders is unsustainable. Fresh assessment action remains available only through lawful procedure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795863</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>