<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1762 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795876</link>
    <description>Arrest safeguards for offences punishable below seven years are examined in relation to alleged cess evasion under the Health Security Se National Security Cess Act, 2025. The notes identify defects including arrest authorisation issued after arrest, inconsistent arrest timing, absence of proof that relatives or nominees were informed or received the arrest memo, no recorded communication of legal-assistance rights, and witnesses unconnected with the arrestee. They also note that the alleged revenue evasion lacked a prior audit or assessment. On this analysis, custodial arrest was considered unjustified, and the arrest, remand and detention were described as set aside with release directed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 08:30:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=913815" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1762 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795876</link>
      <description>Arrest safeguards for offences punishable below seven years are examined in relation to alleged cess evasion under the Health Security Se National Security Cess Act, 2025. The notes identify defects including arrest authorisation issued after arrest, inconsistent arrest timing, absence of proof that relatives or nominees were informed or received the arrest memo, no recorded communication of legal-assistance rights, and witnesses unconnected with the arrestee. They also note that the alleged revenue evasion lacked a prior audit or assessment. On this analysis, custodial arrest was considered unjustified, and the arrest, remand and detention were described as set aside with release directed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795876</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>