https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795880 Restoration of a statutory appeal rejected solely for non-payment of the mandatory pre-deposit was permitted after the petitioner undertook to comply with the deposit requirement. The appellate rejection had not addressed the merits because the prescribed deposit was unpaid. The petitioner was allowed to make the pre-deposit within two weeks, and, on payment, the appeal must be restored and considered on merits. en-us Tue, 21 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Jul 2026 08:30:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795880 Restoration of a statutory appeal rejected solely for non-payment of the mandatory pre-deposit was permitted after the petitioner undertook to comply with the deposit requirement. The appellate rejection had not addressed the merits because the prescribed deposit was unpaid. The petitioner was allowed to make the pre-deposit within two weeks, and, on payment, the appeal must be restored and considered on merits. Case-Laws GST Tue, 21 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795880