<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1767 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795881</link>
    <description>Statutory appellate remedy against the assessment order was required to be pursued. The petitioner was permitted to file an appeal within two weeks, subject to the statutory pre-deposit and a delay-condonation application. The appellate authority must consider the stated circumstances for delay and, if satisfied, decide the appeal on merits in accordance with law. No comment was made on the merits of the challenge to the assessment order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 08:30:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=913810" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1767 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795881</link>
      <description>Statutory appellate remedy against the assessment order was required to be pursued. The petitioner was permitted to file an appeal within two weeks, subject to the statutory pre-deposit and a delay-condonation application. The appellate authority must consider the stated circumstances for delay and, if satisfied, decide the appeal on merits in accordance with law. No comment was made on the merits of the challenge to the assessment order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795881</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>