<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1768 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795882</link>
    <description>Section 75(4) requires the proper officer to afford a personal hearing where an adverse decision is contemplated. Show-cause notices that omit the date, time and venue of the hearing do not satisfy this statutory requirement. Adjudication undertaken without providing that opportunity is contrary to the prescribed procedure and renders the resulting orders unsustainable. The notes state that the assessee succeeded on the failure-to-hear issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 08:30:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=913809" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1768 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795882</link>
      <description>Section 75(4) requires the proper officer to afford a personal hearing where an adverse decision is contemplated. Show-cause notices that omit the date, time and venue of the hearing do not satisfy this statutory requirement. Adjudication undertaken without providing that opportunity is contrary to the prescribed procedure and renders the resulting orders unsustainable. The notes state that the assessee succeeded on the failure-to-hear issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795882</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>