<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 1596 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470422</link>
    <description>An assignee of receivables arising from supplies of goods or services may be treated as an operational creditor for insolvency purposes where the assigned operational debt, debt and default are otherwise established. The notes state that insufficient stamping of assignment or receivable-purchase agreements does not by itself prevent reliance on other evidence of debt and default. They also identify jurisdiction based on the corporate debtor&#039;s registered office, acknowledgement of assigned liability through notices and payment communications, and the absence of a pre-existing dispute where no dispute was communicated or raised in response to the demand notice. The Factoring Regulation Act is described as not barring insolvency proceedings seeking corporate insolvency resolution rather than contractual enforcement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 18:51:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=913773" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 1596 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470422</link>
      <description>An assignee of receivables arising from supplies of goods or services may be treated as an operational creditor for insolvency purposes where the assigned operational debt, debt and default are otherwise established. The notes state that insufficient stamping of assignment or receivable-purchase agreements does not by itself prevent reliance on other evidence of debt and default. They also identify jurisdiction based on the corporate debtor&#039;s registered office, acknowledgement of assigned liability through notices and payment communications, and the absence of a pre-existing dispute where no dispute was communicated or raised in response to the demand notice. The Factoring Regulation Act is described as not barring insolvency proceedings seeking corporate insolvency resolution rather than contractual enforcement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470422</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>