<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1608 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795722</link>
    <description>Interference under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is limited where concurrent orders dismiss a private complaint show no patent illegality, perversity, jurisdictional error or material irregularity. At the stage of examining a complaint, the material must disclose sufficient grounds to proceed; dismissal is justified where it does not prima facie establish the alleged offences. The notes state that an unexplained delay of about five years, along with inadequate material on alleged forgery, shipment valuation and additional commission, failed to disclose a criminal offence. The dispute was characterised as essentially civil, supporting dismissal of the complaint.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 08:27:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=913728" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1608 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795722</link>
      <description>Interference under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is limited where concurrent orders dismiss a private complaint show no patent illegality, perversity, jurisdictional error or material irregularity. At the stage of examining a complaint, the material must disclose sufficient grounds to proceed; dismissal is justified where it does not prima facie establish the alleged offences. The notes state that an unexplained delay of about five years, along with inadequate material on alleged forgery, shipment valuation and additional commission, failed to disclose a criminal offence. The dispute was characterised as essentially civil, supporting dismissal of the complaint.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795722</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>