https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795722 Inherent jurisdiction under the Code of Criminal Procedure does not permit replacement of concurrent revisional findings with an alternative view unless patent illegality, perversity, jurisdictional error or material irregularity is shown. At the complaint-stage inquiry, material must disclose sufficient grounds and prima facie ingredients of the alleged offences. A delayed private complaint concerning an allegedly forged communication, shipment valuation and additional commission lacked satisfactory explanation and did not establish a prima facie criminal offence. The dispute was essentially civil, so no basis existed to interfere with dismissal of the complaint. en-us Fri, 24 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Jul 2026 08:27:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795722 Inherent jurisdiction under the Code of Criminal Procedure does not permit replacement of concurrent revisional findings with an alternative view unless patent illegality, perversity, jurisdictional error or material irregularity is shown. At the complaint-stage inquiry, material must disclose sufficient grounds and prima facie ingredients of the alleged offences. A delayed private complaint concerning an allegedly forged communication, shipment valuation and additional commission lacked satisfactory explanation and did not establish a prima facie criminal offence. The dispute was essentially civil, so no basis existed to interfere with dismissal of the complaint. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 24 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795722