<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1620 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795734</link>
    <description>Settlement of the underlying service-tax demand by the principal noticee under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, waives the related penalty for both the principal noticee and co-noticees. The Tribunal analysis states that this consequence applies even where a co-noticee did not independently file a Scheme declaration. Coordinate division-bench precedent was preferred over a contrary single-member view. Accordingly, the penalty imposed on the co-noticee was unsustainable and was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 08:27:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=913716" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1620 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795734</link>
      <description>Settlement of the underlying service-tax demand by the principal noticee under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, waives the related penalty for both the principal noticee and co-noticees. The Tribunal analysis states that this consequence applies even where a co-noticee did not independently file a Scheme declaration. Coordinate division-bench precedent was preferred over a contrary single-member view. Accordingly, the penalty imposed on the co-noticee was unsustainable and was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795734</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>