https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795739 Writ jurisdiction was unavailable for a private dispute over alleged disappearance or misappropriation of shares where the contractual framework required resolution under stock-exchange rules through Mumbai arbitration and grievance-redressal mechanisms. The allegations required adjudication of contested facts concerning shareholding and Demat transactions, and the petitioner had not used the prescribed remedies. Copying a complaint to the securities regulator did not convert the contractual dispute into one suitable for writ review. The note states that the writ petition was not maintainable, without addressing the merits of the underlying claims. en-us Wed, 22 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Jul 2026 08:27:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795739 Writ jurisdiction was unavailable for a private dispute over alleged disappearance or misappropriation of shares where the contractual framework required resolution under stock-exchange rules through Mumbai arbitration and grievance-redressal mechanisms. The allegations required adjudication of contested facts concerning shareholding and Demat transactions, and the petitioner had not used the prescribed remedies. Copying a complaint to the securities regulator did not convert the contractual dispute into one suitable for writ review. The note states that the writ petition was not maintainable, without addressing the merits of the underlying claims. Case-Laws SEBI Wed, 22 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795739