<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (3) TMI 212 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52894</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal classified the product &quot;Domex&quot; as a disinfectant under Heading No. 3808.90 based on the prominent display of disinfectant properties on the label. Consequently, the demand confirmation of Rs. 74,39,895/- and penalties imposed on the manufacturer and managing partner were set aside in favor of the appellant due to the correct classification of the product.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 12:59:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91371" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (3) TMI 212 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52894</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal classified the product &quot;Domex&quot; as a disinfectant under Heading No. 3808.90 based on the prominent display of disinfectant properties on the label. Consequently, the demand confirmation of Rs. 74,39,895/- and penalties imposed on the manufacturer and managing partner were set aside in favor of the appellant due to the correct classification of the product.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52894</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>