<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1645 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795759</link>
    <description>Reassessment under Section 148 was described as initiated under the applicable statutory provisions, with no jurisdictional defect established. The claimed political-donation deduction was treated as unavailable where search statements, bank-trail analysis, investigation material and fund-layering evidence indicated that the recipient party facilitated accommodation entries and returned cash to donors. Applying human probabilities and the preponderance-of-probabilities standard, banking-channel payments and donation receipts were insufficient to prove a genuine contribution when cumulative circumstances showed that the apparent transaction was not real. The notes state that the reassessment and disallowance were sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 08:27:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=913691" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1645 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795759</link>
      <description>Reassessment under Section 148 was described as initiated under the applicable statutory provisions, with no jurisdictional defect established. The claimed political-donation deduction was treated as unavailable where search statements, bank-trail analysis, investigation material and fund-layering evidence indicated that the recipient party facilitated accommodation entries and returned cash to donors. Applying human probabilities and the preponderance-of-probabilities standard, banking-channel payments and donation receipts were insufficient to prove a genuine contribution when cumulative circumstances showed that the apparent transaction was not real. The notes state that the reassessment and disallowance were sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795759</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>