https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52892 The Tribunal upheld the mandatory penalty imposed by the adjudicating authority under Section 11AC on the firm for engaging in clandestine removal of goods, specifically Branded Chewing Tobacco. It disagreed with the Commissioner (Appeals)'s decision to set aside the penalty, emphasizing the admission of clandestine removal and non-disputed duty liability. The Tribunal found the Commissioner's reasoning lacking and reinstated the penalty, rejecting any reduction as the respondents did not appeal or file cross-objections. The appeal by the Revenue was allowed, modifying the Commissioner (Appeals)'s order and reinstating the penalty on the respondents. en-us Thu, 15 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 Oct 2010 12:56:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52892 The Tribunal upheld the mandatory penalty imposed by the adjudicating authority under Section 11AC on the firm for engaging in clandestine removal of goods, specifically Branded Chewing Tobacco. It disagreed with the Commissioner (Appeals)'s decision to set aside the penalty, emphasizing the admission of clandestine removal and non-disputed duty liability. The Tribunal found the Commissioner's reasoning lacking and reinstated the penalty, rejecting any reduction as the respondents did not appeal or file cross-objections. The appeal by the Revenue was allowed, modifying the Commissioner (Appeals)'s order and reinstating the penalty on the respondents. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 15 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52892