<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1654 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795768</link>
    <description>Reassessment initiated after four years was invalid where the assessee had fully disclosed interest expenditure and investments during the original scrutiny assessment. The disallowance issue had already been specifically examined, while the recorded reasons identified neither any failure of full and true disclosure nor subsequent tangible material. A fresh review of the same disclosed records amounted to a change of opinion; consequently, the reassessment notice was quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 08:27:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=913682" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1654 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795768</link>
      <description>Reassessment initiated after four years was invalid where the assessee had fully disclosed interest expenditure and investments during the original scrutiny assessment. The disallowance issue had already been specifically examined, while the recorded reasons identified neither any failure of full and true disclosure nor subsequent tangible material. A fresh review of the same disclosed records amounted to a change of opinion; consequently, the reassessment notice was quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795768</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>