<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1657 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795771</link>
    <description>Separate show-cause notices are required for distinct financial years; a consolidated notice covering multiple assessment years is not legally sustainable. The composite notice was quashed, while fresh proceedings may be initiated through separate notices for the relevant years. The period from issuance of the composite notice until receipt of the certified judgment copy is excluded when computing limitation for such fresh proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 08:27:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=913679" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1657 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795771</link>
      <description>Separate show-cause notices are required for distinct financial years; a consolidated notice covering multiple assessment years is not legally sustainable. The composite notice was quashed, while fresh proceedings may be initiated through separate notices for the relevant years. The period from issuance of the composite notice until receipt of the certified judgment copy is excluded when computing limitation for such fresh proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795771</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>