https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795776 Challenge to tax demand and recovery action in writ jurisdiction was not entertained because a statutory appellate remedy was available. The petitioner was permitted to file a statutory appeal with an application for condonation of delay and the prescribed pre-deposit. The appellate authority was directed to consider the delay application and, if satisfied, decide the appeal on merits. The factual and legal grounds challenging the demand were left open for appellate determination, and the writ challenge was not adjudicated on merits. en-us Wed, 15 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Jul 2026 08:27:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795776 Challenge to tax demand and recovery action in writ jurisdiction was not entertained because a statutory appellate remedy was available. The petitioner was permitted to file a statutory appeal with an application for condonation of delay and the prescribed pre-deposit. The appellate authority was directed to consider the delay application and, if satisfied, decide the appeal on merits. The factual and legal grounds challenging the demand were left open for appellate determination, and the writ challenge was not adjudicated on merits. Case-Laws GST Wed, 15 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795776