<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1663 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795777</link>
    <description>Statutory appellate remedies must ordinarily be exhausted before invoking writ jurisdiction under Article 226 where legislation provides a specific mechanism to challenge an assessment order. Although alternative remedy is not an absolute bar, writ intervention requires exceptional circumstances, such as manifest arbitrariness or another sustainable basis for judicial review. The notes state that an available appeal, coupled with an unexplained delay of about one and a half years, justified declining discretionary writ relief on the ground of laches. The writ petition was therefore not entertained, leaving the petitioner to pursue the statutory remedy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 08:27:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=913673" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1663 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795777</link>
      <description>Statutory appellate remedies must ordinarily be exhausted before invoking writ jurisdiction under Article 226 where legislation provides a specific mechanism to challenge an assessment order. Although alternative remedy is not an absolute bar, writ intervention requires exceptional circumstances, such as manifest arbitrariness or another sustainable basis for judicial review. The notes state that an available appeal, coupled with an unexplained delay of about one and a half years, justified declining discretionary writ relief on the ground of laches. The writ petition was therefore not entertained, leaving the petitioner to pursue the statutory remedy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795777</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>