<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1663 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795777</link>
    <description>Statutory appellate remedies must ordinarily be exhausted before Article 226 jurisdiction is invoked against assessment orders. Although an alternative remedy is not an absolute bar to judicial review, writ intervention requires extraordinary circumstances, including manifest arbitrariness or another sustainable exception. An available statutory appeal, coupled with an unexplained delay of about one and a half years in challenging the assessment orders, justified declining discretionary relief on grounds of alternative remedy and laches. The challenge was not entertained, leaving the petitioner to pursue the statutory appellate process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 08:27:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=913673" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1663 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795777</link>
      <description>Statutory appellate remedies must ordinarily be exhausted before Article 226 jurisdiction is invoked against assessment orders. Although an alternative remedy is not an absolute bar to judicial review, writ intervention requires extraordinary circumstances, including manifest arbitrariness or another sustainable exception. An available statutory appeal, coupled with an unexplained delay of about one and a half years in challenging the assessment orders, justified declining discretionary relief on grounds of alternative remedy and laches. The challenge was not entertained, leaving the petitioner to pursue the statutory appellate process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795777</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>