https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470394 Voyeurism requires allegations that a woman was watched or recorded while engaged in a private act with a reasonable expectation of privacy; photographs or videos alone do not satisfy that requirement. Criminal intimidation requires a particularised threat of injury intended to cause alarm, which cannot rest on a bare assertion. Wrongful restraint requires obstruction of a person entitled to proceed, subject to a good-faith belief in lawful right. Where prosecution material does not disclose these statutory ingredients or create strong suspicion based on legally tenable evidence, discharge is warranted and the dispute remains within available civil remedies. en-us Tue, 02 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 25 Jul 2026 14:11:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470394 Voyeurism requires allegations that a woman was watched or recorded while engaged in a private act with a reasonable expectation of privacy; photographs or videos alone do not satisfy that requirement. Criminal intimidation requires a particularised threat of injury intended to cause alarm, which cannot rest on a bare assertion. Wrongful restraint requires obstruction of a person entitled to proceed, subject to a good-faith belief in lawful right. Where prosecution material does not disclose these statutory ingredients or create strong suspicion based on legally tenable evidence, discharge is warranted and the dispute remains within available civil remedies. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 02 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470394