<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 2314 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470393</link>
    <description>Settlement of a duty-demand dispute under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 is stated to waive penalties not only for the principal noticee but also for co-noticees facing penalty proceedings under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The notes state that binding Division Bench decisions prevail over a contrary Single Member view. Consequently, penalties imposed on co-noticees are described as unsustainable where the principal noticee has settled the underlying duty demand under the Scheme.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 14:08:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=913615" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 2314 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470393</link>
      <description>Settlement of a duty-demand dispute under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 is stated to waive penalties not only for the principal noticee but also for co-noticees facing penalty proceedings under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The notes state that binding Division Bench decisions prevail over a contrary Single Member view. Consequently, penalties imposed on co-noticees are described as unsustainable where the principal noticee has settled the underlying duty demand under the Scheme.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470393</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>