<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1604 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795718</link>
    <description>Where a survey yields no adverse material and books produced later disclose no discrepancy, rejection of the accounts cannot by itself justify enhancement of turnover. Although the accounts may be rejected in those circumstances, turnover enhancement requires supporting material. The notes state that the enhancement was unsustainable and that the disclosed turnover was accepted in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 14:06:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=913613" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1604 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795718</link>
      <description>Where a survey yields no adverse material and books produced later disclose no discrepancy, rejection of the accounts cannot by itself justify enhancement of turnover. Although the accounts may be rejected in those circumstances, turnover enhancement requires supporting material. The notes state that the enhancement was unsustainable and that the disclosed turnover was accepted in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795718</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>