<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (5) TMI 135 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52884</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai held that molasses valuation for captive consumption or sale should be based on actual costing or genuine sale price, not comparable goods price. Sales by tender without issues are deemed acceptable as contract prices under Section 4(1)(a) value. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 12:17:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91361" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (5) TMI 135 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52884</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai held that molasses valuation for captive consumption or sale should be based on actual costing or genuine sale price, not comparable goods price. Sales by tender without issues are deemed acceptable as contract prices under Section 4(1)(a) value. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52884</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>