<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1544 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795658</link>
    <description>Services provided to an SEZ unit for authorised operations are exempt from service tax under the SEZ Act and Rules even when physically performed outside the SEZ. The statutory exemption does not impose a territorial performance condition, and the SEZ Act&#039;s overriding effect prevents delegated legislation from narrowing that entitlement. The extended limitation period under the Finance Act is unavailable where the dispute concerns statutory interpretation, transactions are recorded in the assessee&#039;s accounts, and there is no fraud, wilful misstatement, or suppression with intent to evade tax. The demand therefore lacked substantive and limitation-based support, with consequential relief available.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 08:54:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=913565" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1544 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795658</link>
      <description>Services provided to an SEZ unit for authorised operations are exempt from service tax under the SEZ Act and Rules even when physically performed outside the SEZ. The statutory exemption does not impose a territorial performance condition, and the SEZ Act&#039;s overriding effect prevents delegated legislation from narrowing that entitlement. The extended limitation period under the Finance Act is unavailable where the dispute concerns statutory interpretation, transactions are recorded in the assessee&#039;s accounts, and there is no fraud, wilful misstatement, or suppression with intent to evade tax. The demand therefore lacked substantive and limitation-based support, with consequential relief available.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795658</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>