<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1546 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795660</link>
    <description>Property of equivalent value may be attached where directly derived proceeds of crime are unavailable or laundered, including assets acquired before the scheduled offence, if substantial cash deposits and asset sources remain unexplained. Evidence of cash deposits, multiple accounts, digital material and investment routing supported attachment as proceeds of crime. Challenges based on the predicate allegations, alleged absence of a money trail, invalid reasons to believe, non-supply of documents and absence of a scheduled offence did not displace the attachment framework. Accounts used by consultancy and online-class entities and joint accounts used to park funds remained attached. Pension, gratuity and provident-fund components required segregation and release, while other balances remained under attachment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 08:54:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=913563" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1546 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795660</link>
      <description>Property of equivalent value may be attached where directly derived proceeds of crime are unavailable or laundered, including assets acquired before the scheduled offence, if substantial cash deposits and asset sources remain unexplained. Evidence of cash deposits, multiple accounts, digital material and investment routing supported attachment as proceeds of crime. Challenges based on the predicate allegations, alleged absence of a money trail, invalid reasons to believe, non-supply of documents and absence of a scheduled offence did not displace the attachment framework. Accounts used by consultancy and online-class entities and joint accounts used to park funds remained attached. Pension, gratuity and provident-fund components required segregation and release, while other balances remained under attachment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795660</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>