<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1548 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795662</link>
    <description>Money-laundering bail requires a prima facie link between the alleged funds and an accomplished scheduled offence before dominion or control over those funds becomes relevant. Remuneration for physical-education training, received largely before the association was declared unlawful and before the predicate FIR, was not prima facie established as proceeds of crime. Post-arrest statements recorded under Section 50 were treated as affected by protections against compelled self-incrimination, while pre-arrest statements established receipt but not a criminal source. Regular bail was supported by parity with co-accused, prolonged pre-trial custody, unlikely early trial, and satisfaction of the flight-risk, evidence-tampering and witness-influence assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 08:54:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=913561" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1548 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795662</link>
      <description>Money-laundering bail requires a prima facie link between the alleged funds and an accomplished scheduled offence before dominion or control over those funds becomes relevant. Remuneration for physical-education training, received largely before the association was declared unlawful and before the predicate FIR, was not prima facie established as proceeds of crime. Post-arrest statements recorded under Section 50 were treated as affected by protections against compelled self-incrimination, while pre-arrest statements established receipt but not a criminal source. Regular bail was supported by parity with co-accused, prolonged pre-trial custody, unlikely early trial, and satisfaction of the flight-risk, evidence-tampering and witness-influence assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795662</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>