<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1548 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795662</link>
    <description>Money-laundering liability requires funds to be prima facie derived or obtained from an accomplished scheduled offence; mere receipt, dominion or control over funds does not establish that foundational requirement. The notes distinguish remuneration received before an association was declared unlawful or a predicate FIR was registered from proceeds of crime, particularly where no material links the sums to an identified scheduled offence. They also state that post-arrest statements under Section 50 may raise self-incrimination and confessional-statement concerns. For regular bail, the discussion identifies parity with bailed co-accused, prolonged pre-trial custody, delayed trial, and satisfaction of the triple test as relevant considerations despite statutory restrictions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 08:54:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=913561" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1548 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795662</link>
      <description>Money-laundering liability requires funds to be prima facie derived or obtained from an accomplished scheduled offence; mere receipt, dominion or control over funds does not establish that foundational requirement. The notes distinguish remuneration received before an association was declared unlawful or a predicate FIR was registered from proceeds of crime, particularly where no material links the sums to an identified scheduled offence. They also state that post-arrest statements under Section 50 may raise self-incrimination and confessional-statement concerns. For regular bail, the discussion identifies parity with bailed co-accused, prolonged pre-trial custody, delayed trial, and satisfaction of the triple test as relevant considerations despite statutory restrictions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795662</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>