<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1578 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795692</link>
    <description>Rectification under Section 254(2) is limited to mistakes apparent from the record in the Tribunal&#039;s own order. Recovery of demand while a stay order remains operative concerns implementation of that order, not an apparent error within the stay order itself. As no error in the stay order was identified, a miscellaneous application seeking rectification for the alleged recovery was not maintainable. The text also notes that the Revenue indicated a refund was being processed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 08:54:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=913531" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1578 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795692</link>
      <description>Rectification under Section 254(2) is limited to mistakes apparent from the record in the Tribunal&#039;s own order. Recovery of demand while a stay order remains operative concerns implementation of that order, not an apparent error within the stay order itself. As no error in the stay order was identified, a miscellaneous application seeking rectification for the alleged recovery was not maintainable. The text also notes that the Revenue indicated a refund was being processed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795692</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>