<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1586 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795700</link>
    <description>Reassessment limitation is assessed on the information available when proceedings are initiated; information indicating unreported salary income and immovable-property investment supported escaped income exceeding the applicable threshold, and prior approval was obtained. The reassessment notice was therefore valid. The unexplained-investment addition was deleted because the accepted housing loan and bank records established that the remaining property consideration came from personal savings. The HRA disallowance was also deleted because salary records, rent evidence and computation substantiated the claim under the prescribed least-of-three formula. The reassessment challenge failed, but the property-investment and HRA additions were removed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 08:54:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=913523" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1586 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795700</link>
      <description>Reassessment limitation is assessed on the information available when proceedings are initiated; information indicating unreported salary income and immovable-property investment supported escaped income exceeding the applicable threshold, and prior approval was obtained. The reassessment notice was therefore valid. The unexplained-investment addition was deleted because the accepted housing loan and bank records established that the remaining property consideration came from personal savings. The HRA disallowance was also deleted because salary records, rent evidence and computation substantiated the claim under the prescribed least-of-three formula. The reassessment challenge failed, but the property-investment and HRA additions were removed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795700</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>