<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Separate tax-period assessment is mandatory under Section 74; composite GST adjudication was quashed and fresh proceedings directed.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102085</link>
    <description>Section 74 requires assessment by reference to a particular tax period; therefore, a composite notice and adjudication covering multiple assessment years as a block assessment is legally unsustainable. The composite adjudication was quashed, with fresh separate proceedings directed for each year. Where witness statements support GST liability or confiscation findings, cross-examination of non-co-noticee witnesses cannot be denied merely because statements were unretracted, corroborated, or presumed immune from challenge; the request must be reconsidered on proper reasons. Co-noticees facing penalties for aiding or abetting need not be cross-examined. Privately maintained documents, including pocket diaries, require proof through their author or responsible custodian; this issue remains open in fresh adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 08:54:57 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 08:54:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=913505" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Separate tax-period assessment is mandatory under Section 74; composite GST adjudication was quashed and fresh proceedings directed.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102085</link>
      <description>Section 74 requires assessment by reference to a particular tax period; therefore, a composite notice and adjudication covering multiple assessment years as a block assessment is legally unsustainable. The composite adjudication was quashed, with fresh separate proceedings directed for each year. Where witness statements support GST liability or confiscation findings, cross-examination of non-co-noticee witnesses cannot be denied merely because statements were unretracted, corroborated, or presumed immune from challenge; the request must be reconsidered on proper reasons. Co-noticees facing penalties for aiding or abetting need not be cross-examined. Privately maintained documents, including pocket diaries, require proof through their author or responsible custodian; this issue remains open in fresh adjudication.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 08:54:57 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102085</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>