<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (5) TMI 123 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52869</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit on capital goods could be claimed in two stages: up to 50% in the year of receipt and the balance in a later financial year. The rule restricted only the credit available in the year of receipt; it did not cause unavailed credit to lapse. Where the assessee was under exemption when the capital goods were received and became eligible to opt for duty payment and the Cenvat scheme only in a later year, denial of credit merely because no credit was taken in the year of receipt was inconsistent with the rule. The 50% Cenvat credit was therefore allowable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2017 10:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91346" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (5) TMI 123 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52869</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit on capital goods could be claimed in two stages: up to 50% in the year of receipt and the balance in a later financial year. The rule restricted only the credit available in the year of receipt; it did not cause unavailed credit to lapse. Where the assessee was under exemption when the capital goods were received and became eligible to opt for duty payment and the Cenvat scheme only in a later year, denial of credit merely because no credit was taken in the year of receipt was inconsistent with the rule. The 50% Cenvat credit was therefore allowable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52869</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>