<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1435 - GUWAHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795549</link>
    <description>Auction disqualification for provident fund default may extend beyond formal corporate separateness where the record shows that a company and its director substantively managed the same enterprise. The notes explain that a director&#039;s statutory default may therefore affect the company&#039;s eligibility under an auction condition barring provident fund defaulters. They also address judicial review of auction cancellation: a contemporaneously recorded ground concerning public interest, including circumstances indicating bidder collusion, may be considered even if omitted from the cancellation communication, provided procedural fairness is maintained. Common sourcing of earnest money deposits is identified as a relevant circumstance for assessing apparent collusion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 08:36:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=913391" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1435 - GUWAHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795549</link>
      <description>Auction disqualification for provident fund default may extend beyond formal corporate separateness where the record shows that a company and its director substantively managed the same enterprise. The notes explain that a director&#039;s statutory default may therefore affect the company&#039;s eligibility under an auction condition barring provident fund defaulters. They also address judicial review of auction cancellation: a contemporaneously recorded ground concerning public interest, including circumstances indicating bidder collusion, may be considered even if omitted from the cancellation communication, provided procedural fairness is maintained. Common sourcing of earnest money deposits is identified as a relevant circumstance for assessing apparent collusion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795549</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>