<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1453 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795567</link>
    <description>Vocational-training exemption under Notification No. 24/2004-ST covered construction-related skills training that enabled trainees to obtain employment or self-employment directly after training. The later narrowing of the vocational-training definition by Notification No. 3/2010-ST applied prospectively, so the exemption remained available for the pre-amendment period. Extended limitation required fraud, collusion, wilful misstatement or suppression with intent to evade tax. Registration, voluntary tax payment and a bona fide exemption claim, without evidence of intent to evade, restricted any recovery to the normal period and did not support penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 08:36:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=913373" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1453 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795567</link>
      <description>Vocational-training exemption under Notification No. 24/2004-ST covered construction-related skills training that enabled trainees to obtain employment or self-employment directly after training. The later narrowing of the vocational-training definition by Notification No. 3/2010-ST applied prospectively, so the exemption remained available for the pre-amendment period. Extended limitation required fraud, collusion, wilful misstatement or suppression with intent to evade tax. Registration, voluntary tax payment and a bona fide exemption claim, without evidence of intent to evade, restricted any recovery to the normal period and did not support penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795567</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>