<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (2) TMI 192 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52860</link>
    <description>The Tribunal affirmed the classification of vacuum cleaners under Chapter Heading 85.09 as Electro-mechanical domestic appliances, rejecting the appellant&#039;s classification under 8479.89 as Machines and mechanical appliances for industrial use. The authorities ordered confiscation of goods, imposed fines, and penalties. The Tribunal remanded the matter to investigate if identical goods were previously classified under 8479.89, allowing the appellant to provide relevant evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 11:27:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91337" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (2) TMI 192 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52860</link>
      <description>The Tribunal affirmed the classification of vacuum cleaners under Chapter Heading 85.09 as Electro-mechanical domestic appliances, rejecting the appellant&#039;s classification under 8479.89 as Machines and mechanical appliances for industrial use. The authorities ordered confiscation of goods, imposed fines, and penalties. The Tribunal remanded the matter to investigate if identical goods were previously classified under 8479.89, allowing the appellant to provide relevant evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52860</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>