<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1458 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795572</link>
    <description>Challenges to provisional attachment of property should be pursued through the statutory adjudication mechanism. The petitioners may place all grounds and supporting documents before the Adjudicating Authority, which must consider their explanation and evidence during final adjudication and issue a reasoned order. The writ petition was disposed of with liberty to pursue that statutory remedy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 08:36:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=913368" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1458 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795572</link>
      <description>Challenges to provisional attachment of property should be pursued through the statutory adjudication mechanism. The petitioners may place all grounds and supporting documents before the Adjudicating Authority, which must consider their explanation and evidence during final adjudication and issue a reasoned order. The writ petition was disposed of with liberty to pursue that statutory remedy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795572</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>