<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1495 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795609</link>
    <description>Prosecution for wilful tax evasion under Section 276C(1)(i) cannot continue where the penalty for search-related undisclosed income under Section 271AAB has been quashed and that order remains unstayed. Since the penalty and prosecution rested on identical allegations, quashing the penalty removed the foundational finding of concealment. A pending departmental appeal did not preserve that foundation in the absence of a stay. Continuing criminal proceedings in those circumstances constitutes abuse of process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 08:36:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=913331" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1495 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795609</link>
      <description>Prosecution for wilful tax evasion under Section 276C(1)(i) cannot continue where the penalty for search-related undisclosed income under Section 271AAB has been quashed and that order remains unstayed. Since the penalty and prosecution rested on identical allegations, quashing the penalty removed the foundational finding of concealment. A pending departmental appeal did not preserve that foundation in the absence of a stay. Continuing criminal proceedings in those circumstances constitutes abuse of process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795609</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>