<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 1524 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795638</link>
    <description>GST liability proceedings under Section 73 cannot be initiated or concluded against a deceased sole proprietor where the authorities knew of the death but did not issue notice to the legal representative. Section 93 imposes liability on legal representatives or persons continuing the business, but does not authorise adjudication in the deceased person&#039;s name. Notice to a living and correctly identified person is a foundational jurisdictional requirement, and participation by an authorised representative cannot cure this defect. The show cause notice and consequential order were non est and quashed, with fresh proceedings permitted against the legal representative in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 08:36:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=913302" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 1524 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795638</link>
      <description>GST liability proceedings under Section 73 cannot be initiated or concluded against a deceased sole proprietor where the authorities knew of the death but did not issue notice to the legal representative. Section 93 imposes liability on legal representatives or persons continuing the business, but does not authorise adjudication in the deceased person&#039;s name. Notice to a living and correctly identified person is a foundational jurisdictional requirement, and participation by an authorised representative cannot cure this defect. The show cause notice and consequential order were non est and quashed, with fresh proceedings permitted against the legal representative in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=795638</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>