<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Draft assessment order requirement protects non-resident taxpayers&#039; Dispute Resolution Panel remedy; bypassing it invalidates a prejudicial assessment.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102037</link>
    <description>A draft assessment order is required before a prejudicial variation is made to an eligible non-resident individual, preserving the statutory opportunity to seek Dispute Resolution Panel review; the article reports that bypassing this requirement rendered the final assessment jurisdictionally invalid. It further states that best judgment assessment requires actual statutory non-compliance, which was absent where a verified return and supporting responses were furnished. Assessment of an accepted non-resident must be completed by the International Taxation officer, and faceless proceedings did not cure the Gurgaon officer&#039;s lack of jurisdiction. Duplicate Form 26AS reporting could not justify an addition where the property deed, bank records and remittance source explained the actual purchase. The reported assessment, demand and penalty notice were quashed without remand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 08:36:14 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 08:36:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=913289" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Draft assessment order requirement protects non-resident taxpayers&#039; Dispute Resolution Panel remedy; bypassing it invalidates a prejudicial assessment.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102037</link>
      <description>A draft assessment order is required before a prejudicial variation is made to an eligible non-resident individual, preserving the statutory opportunity to seek Dispute Resolution Panel review; the article reports that bypassing this requirement rendered the final assessment jurisdictionally invalid. It further states that best judgment assessment requires actual statutory non-compliance, which was absent where a verified return and supporting responses were furnished. Assessment of an accepted non-resident must be completed by the International Taxation officer, and faceless proceedings did not cure the Gurgaon officer&#039;s lack of jurisdiction. Duplicate Form 26AS reporting could not justify an addition where the property deed, bank records and remittance source explained the actual purchase. The reported assessment, demand and penalty notice were quashed without remand.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 08:36:14 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102037</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>