<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (3) TMI 193 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52850</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the show cause notice and subsequent proceedings, including the confiscation of goods and the vehicle, along with the penalty imposed on the party. The decision emphasized procedural compliance and the availability of statutory remedies in customs adjudication, safeguarding importers&#039; rights in assessment and enforcement actions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 11:07:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91327" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (3) TMI 193 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52850</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the show cause notice and subsequent proceedings, including the confiscation of goods and the vehicle, along with the penalty imposed on the party. The decision emphasized procedural compliance and the availability of statutory remedies in customs adjudication, safeguarding importers&#039; rights in assessment and enforcement actions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52850</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>