<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 1441 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470332</link>
    <description>Limitation for tax penalty proceedings is examined as a jurisdictional issue that may support a writ challenge to a show-cause notice without requiring exhaustion of statutory remedies. The notes explain that, even where the penalty provision contains no express limitation period, proceedings must be initiated and completed within a reasonable time. An analogous five-year period applicable to original and escaped assessments is identified as the appropriate benchmark. Departmental requests for documents or alleged non-cooperation do not extend that period where proceedings could be completed on available material. A penalty notice issued after the reasonable period is described as liable to be quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 20:51:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=913258" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 1441 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470332</link>
      <description>Limitation for tax penalty proceedings is examined as a jurisdictional issue that may support a writ challenge to a show-cause notice without requiring exhaustion of statutory remedies. The notes explain that, even where the penalty provision contains no express limitation period, proceedings must be initiated and completed within a reasonable time. An analogous five-year period applicable to original and escaped assessments is identified as the appropriate benchmark. Departmental requests for documents or alleged non-cooperation do not extend that period where proceedings could be completed on available material. A penalty notice issued after the reasonable period is described as liable to be quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470332</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>