<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 1844 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470328</link>
    <description>Reassessment for AY 2016-17 could not rely on the extended search-related framework because the petitioner was not searched and the material found in another group&#039;s search was not shown to belong to, pertain to, or relate to the petitioner. The notice therefore had to satisfy the ordinary reassessment limitation rules. Issued beyond the prescribed six-year period from the end of the relevant assessment year, it was time-barred and invalid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 17:32:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=913212" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 1844 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470328</link>
      <description>Reassessment for AY 2016-17 could not rely on the extended search-related framework because the petitioner was not searched and the material found in another group&#039;s search was not shown to belong to, pertain to, or relate to the petitioner. The notice therefore had to satisfy the ordinary reassessment limitation rules. Issued beyond the prescribed six-year period from the end of the relevant assessment year, it was time-barred and invalid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=470328</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>